![]() show is the general term but sometimes implies that what is revealed must be gained by inference from acts, looks, or words.Ĭareful not to show his true feelings manifest implies a plainer, more immediate revelation. Show, manifest, evidence, evince, demonstrate mean to reveal outwardly or make apparent. Her feelings about him are plain clear implies an absence of anything that confuses the mind or obscures the pattern. The obvious solution apparent is very close to evident except that it may imply more conscious exercise of inference.įor no apparent reason plain suggests lack of intricacy, complexity, or elaboration. Patent defects distinct implies such sharpness of outline or definition that no unusual effort to see or hear or comprehend is required.Ī distinct refusal obvious implies such ease in discovering that it often suggests conspicuousness or little need for perspicacity in the observer. ![]() Manifest hostility patent applies to a cause, effect, or significant feature that is clear and unmistakable once attention has been directed to it. evident implies presence of visible signs that lead one to a definite conclusion.Īn evident fondness for sweets manifest implies an external display so evident that little or no inference is required. #Manifest definition trialStart your free trial today.Evident, manifest, patent, distinct, obvious, apparent, plain, clear mean readily perceived or apprehended. Continental Expansion, History, Art & Archives: U.S House of Representatives.Īccess hundreds of hours of historical video, commercial free, with HISTORY Vault. Michael Golay, The Tide of Empire: America’s March to the PacificĮra of U.S. Sean Wilentz, The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln (New York: Norton, 2005). Pratt, “The Origin of ‘Manifest Destiny’,” The American Historical Review (July 1927). expansion also fueled the growing debate over slavery, by raising the pressing question of whether new states being admitted to the Union would allow slavery or not-a conflict that would eventually lead to the Civil War. The administrations of both Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren resisted such calls, fearing both war with Mexico and opposition from Americans who believed calls for annexation were linked with the desire to expand slavery in the Southwest.ĭespite the lofty idealism of Manifest Destiny, the rapid territorial expansion over the first half of the 19th century resulted not only in war with Mexico, but in the dislocation and brutal mistreatment of Native American, Hispanic and other non-European occupants of the territories now being occupied by the United States. ![]() Nonetheless, there were still more Anglo settlers in Texas than Hispanic ones, and in 1836, after Texas won its own independence, its new leaders sought to join the United States. Texas IndependenceĬries for the “re-annexation” of Texas increased after Mexico, having won its independence from Spain, passed a law suspending U.S. This policy of an American sphere of influence and of non-intervention in European affairs became known as the “ Monroe Doctrine.” After 1870, it would be used as a rationale for U.S. ![]() In 1823, Monroe invoked Manifest Destiny when he spoke before Congress to warn European nations not to interfere with America’s Westward expansion, threatening that any attempt by Europeans to colonize the “American continents” would be seen as an act of war. But critics of that treaty faulted Monroe and his secretary of state, John Quincy Adams, for yielding to Spain what they considered legitimate claims on Texas, where many Americans continued to settle. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |